Fide-o Search

Loading...

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Sola Fide

'The Reformers called the doctrine of justification by faith alone (sola fide) the “material principle” of all theology because it involves the very matter, substance, or heart of what any man or woman must understand and believe to be saved." In Romans 3 Paul establishes the fact that we are all sinners and have no hope of saving ourselves. Then he writes:

But now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. This righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in his blood (Rom. 3:31-25).


Here Paul teaches us of redemption (our salvation purchased), propitiation (a sacrifice of atonement), and justification (our freedom from sin’s guilt declared). Literally, this word justified means to be “declared righteous.” This is what caused Martin Luther problems: how could God declare me righteous unless I am righteous? The Catholic church thus teaches that you are made righteous through the sacraments and, if needed, purgatory until you fully work off your guilt and achieve intrinsic righteousness.

Finally, Luther discovered that little word “declared” that makes all the difference. When God declares us righteous we aren’t righteous in deeds, but we have had the righteousness of Christ’s life imputed to our “spiritual account.” By God’s grace based on Christ’s works God declares sinners righteous when they put their faith in Christ alone. That is sola fide.

The righteousness of God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe (Rom. 3:22).


"When those who have been made alive by God turn from attempts to establish and please God by their own righteousness, which can only condemn them, and instead embrace the Lord Jesus Christ alone, by faith alone, rejoicing in the grace of God alone, God declares their sins to have been atoned for by the death of his beloved Son, and he justifies them solely by his own perfect righteousness applied to their account. This is Christianity. This is the gospel, and to believe it and commit oneself to Jesus Christ is salvation." (quotes by James Montgomery Boice, Whatever Happened To the Gospel of Grace?)

This "material principle" is under attack again within the Protestant church. This new wave of armchair theologians and postmodern bloggers are embracing sacramentalism. From giving Catholic doctrines a pass to the EC's monastic communities, it is the same ol' attack against sola fide. John Calvin said, "Let it therefore remain settled that this proposition is exclusive, that we are justified in no other way than by faith … by faith alone." (The Epistles of Paul the Apostle to the Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, and Colossians, page 39).

5 Spoke Up:

Wayne Hatcher said...

Jason, you begin with The Reformers called the doctrine of justification by faith alone (sola fide) the “material principle” of all theology because it involves the very matter, substance, or heart of what any man or woman must understand and believe to be saved.
This is just plain bad. At first I thought this opening statement was just poorly worded, but every time I read it again, it got worse. All of the words sound good, sound orthodox. The harder I tried to connect thoughts to those words as they formed sentences, the more I realized that not only was this a bad, poorly expressed sentence, it expresses a wrong thought. It is all too easy for bad theology to hide within a long run-on sentence. You need to rethink this opening statement. It damages the whole post to the point that anybody thinking as they read will wonder if you know what you are talking about further down the page. Maybe that is why no one has commented on this post yet.

Jason E. Robertson said...

That quote is from James Montgomery Boice whom I gave credit to in the post. I hate that you feel that way about Dr. Boice's writing skills and/or theology. If you are not familier with this beloved theologian, he was the senior minister of Philadephia's historic Tenth Presbyterian Church for 30 years. He went home to the Lord in June 2000. He taught on an international radio broadcast, "The Bible Study Hour," was a prolific author, and served for ten years as chairman of the International Council of Biblical Inerrancy. And you are the first that I know of that spoke of his writings in such derogatory terms.

Wayne Hatcher said...

Jason,
Yes, I know who James Montgomery Boice was. Your brief biography looks like the blurb on the inside back jacket of the book of his you quoted from. Dr. Boice was also a charter member of the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals, which drafted the Cambridge Declaration, which deals primarily with the reclamation of the five solae. He was also a very close friend of Dr. R. C. Sproul. I believe Dr. Boice grew up at 10th Presbyterian, and was preceded in that pulpit by Dr. Barnhouse. Yes, I do know who Dr. Boice is.
As for me, no I'm not a lettered pastor or theologian, I'm just a truck driver. John Bunyan was just an uneducated tinker. John Piperin his biographical sketch of the great Dr. John Owen tells of his great admiration of Bunyan "One story says that King Charles II asked Owen one time why he bothered going to hear an uneducated Tinker like Bunyan preach. Owen replied, "Could I posses the tinker's abilities for preaching, please your majesty, I would gladly relinquish all my learning". Yes, I'm just a dumb truck driver.

No, I was not aware that the selection that I chose to draw out from your post was quoted by Dr. Boice. If I had read every book ever written, which I haven't, I would hope you wouldn't expect me to recognize the source of everything cited in every post. My comment was not derogatory to his writings, just the one quote. I do not feel that way about his writing skills and/or theology, just that one quote. Your manner of response was intended to belittle me, to infer that that I am an idiot, or at least do not have the right to question your or Dr. Boice's judgment, even to the matter of one small sentence.

At the risk of accusing you of doctoring your post after my comment, I must say that I do not remember the quotes around the selection, nor the credit near the end of your piece. I copied and pasted the words directly from your post to use in my comments, and the quotes did not show up in my comment, though I may not have included those in my copying. It is still odd that when I looked at the post again today, there is a single quote (') at the beginning, and a proper quote (") at the end. I would think that I would have remembered that oddity. Also, these quotes are plain quotes, while the quotes around "material principle" are different, so called smart quotes. I do remember seeing the one citation at the end, but I do not remember seeing the Boice citation. All in all, they all could have been there. Don't take offense.

Yes, I have followed up on you, and yes, it is from Boice. You did, however, pull the quote out of context, omitting the emphasis on sola scriptura, which is what bothered me about the quote in the first place; well, at least partially. You also botched the quotation marks, as I have pointed out earlier. You also have pieced parts of two sentences together to get the one sentence you call a quote. You also added (sola fide), which is not found anywhere in the context, although it was implied. Here is the full context of your quote:

But I must say here that there is no place at which our recovery needs to begin more rigorously than with the doctrine of justification by faith, since this is what the Reformers called the "material principle" of all theology. They called the doctrine of Scripture alone the "formal principle" because it is from the Bible that we derive our theology. We believe what we believe because we find it in the Bible. But then, having established the sole source from which our doctrine comes, the Reformers turned to justification and called it the "material principle," because it involves the very matter, substance, or heart of what any man or woman must understand and believe to be saved. James Montgomerry Boice, Whatever Happened to the Gospel of Grace? (Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway Books, 2001), p. 129.

All that said, I still maintain that the quotation is flawed thinking. You didn't do it an favors by butchering it up, as I have explained above. I didn't say that it was heresy, or even bad theology. I just happen to believe that, even considering the original context, it is written poorly, and doesn't take into consideration a number of issues. Dr. Boice doesn't even cite his sources. The next page over he does say "Luther said this.", and Calvin said that.", but he doesn't even document that. I have heard some of those things he said the reformers said, and I believe those to be factual. I do believe that the quote in question, however, that Dr. Boice takes and stretches a bit, bumbles a bit, and then comes up with something that is just almost, but not quite right.

I'm not going to do all of the work for you. You go and see if you can find a Reformation-era source for the phrase material principle in connection with sola fide. When you give up, you might bone up on your Aristotelian philosophy. Aristotle is the one, you know, who defined God as the unmoved mover .R. C. Sproul might be able to help you here. You could also give up your prejudices and preconceived notions and take a hard, honest look at the quote and see what might be objectionable about it. Do you believe everything Boice believed? You're not a paedo-baptist, are you?

Jason E. Robertson said...

woof, watch out for trucks!

Scott Hill said...

I am amazed more and more what people choose to debate about. This started out as an opposition to a quote then turned into an opposition as to how it was posted.

You can't win for losing in this crazy bloggin world we live in.

PW you need a Fide-O trucker hat. Check the sidebar in a few days and we will have one available for you.